4.7 Article

Synthesis of carbon doped WO3•0.33H2O hierarchical photocatalyst with improved photocatalytic activity

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 182-190

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.115

关键词

Carbon doping; WO3 center dot 0.33H(2)O; Photocatalysis; RhB

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21271055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A carbon doping method is developed to overcome the drawback of conventional carbon doping method. The carbon dopant is synthesized by treating carbon with dilute nitric acid through hydrothermal process. Carbon-doped WO3 center dot 0.33H(2)O (C-WO3 center dot 0.33H(2)O) is obtained by adding the carbon dopant solution, and then through an additional hydrothermal process. Based on XRD, Raman and XPS, carbon have been incorporated into the interstitial position of WO3 center dot 0.33H(2)O unit cell rather than substitution of oxygen in lattice of WO3 center dot 0.33H(2)O, which induces distortion of WO6 octahedron and lattice defect. In addition, carbon doping also induces the emergence of new level above the valence band. The new level increases the migration pathway of photo-generated carriers, which reduces the recombination rate of photo-generated carriers. The changes of band structure, distortion of WO6 octahedron and lattice defect are beneficial to improve the photocatalytic performance of WO3 center dot 0.33H(2)O. Compared with pristine WO3 center dot 0.33H(2)O, C-WO3 center dot 0.33H(2)O display better photocatalytic performance on degradation of rhodamine B (RhB), which include the faster de-ethylation process and cycloreversion process. Moreover, the experiments of radical quenchers confirmed that the h(+) display the main influence on degradation of RhB. This study implies that carbon can be doped into some metal oxide hydrates through a mild preparation process, which provides a possible way for the synthesis of carbon doped thermal unstable materials. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据