4.8 Article

Human NEIL3 Gene Expression Regulated by Epigenetic-Like Oxidative DNA Modification

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 141, 期 28, 页码 11036-11049

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b01847

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA090689]
  2. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center [P30 CA042014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The NEIL3 DNA repair gene is induced in cells or animal models experiencing oxidative or inflammatory stress along with oxidation of guanine (G) to 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (OG) in the genome. We hypothesize that a G-rich promoter element that is a potential G-quadruplexforming sequence (PQS) in NEIL3 is a site for introduction of OG with epigenetic-like potential for gene regulation. Activation occurs when OG is formed in the NEIL3 PQS located near the transcription start site. Oxidative stress either introduced by TNF alpha or synthetically incorporated into precise locations focuses the base excision repair process to read and catalyze removal of OG via OG-glycosylase I (OGG1), yielding an abasic site (AP). Thermodynamic studies showed that AP destabilizes the duplex, enabling a structural transition of the sequence to a G-quadruplex (G4) fold that positions the AP in a loop facilitated by the NEIL3 PQS having five G runs in which the four unmodified runs adopt a stable G4. This presents AP to apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) that poorly cleaves the AP backbone in this context according to in vitro studies, allowing the protein to function as a trans activator of transcription. The proposal is supported by chemical studies in cellulo and in vitro. Activation of NEIL3 expression via the proposed mechanism allows cells to respond to mutagenic DNA damage removed by NEIL3 associated with oxidative or inflammatory stress. Lastly, inspection of many mammalian genomes identified conservation of the NEIL3 PQS, suggesting this sequence was favorably selected to function as a redox switch with OG as the epigenetic-like regulatory modification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据