4.8 Article

Epitaxial Growth and Integration of Insulating Metal-Organic Frameworks in Electrochemistry

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 141, 期 28, 页码 11322-11327

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b05869

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0203900, 2017YFA0207303, 2018YFA0209400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571037, 21501030, 21733003, 21771040, 21961132003]
  3. 1000 Plan Program for Young Talents
  4. Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16520710100, 17JC1400100]
  5. CURE (Hui-Chun and Tsung-Dao Lee Chinese Undergraduate Research Endowment) [16933]
  6. National University Student Innovation Program [16933]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With tunable pore size and rich active metal centers, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been regarded as the one of the promising materials for catalysis. Prospectively, employing MOFs in electrochemistry would notably broaden the scope of electrocatalysis. However, this application is largely hindered by MOFs' conventionally poor electrical conductivity. Integrating MOFs without compromising their crystalline superiority holds a grand challenge to unveil their pristine electrocatalytic properties. In this work, we introduce an epitaxial growth strategy to accomplish the efficient integration of the insulating MOFs into electrochemistry. Particularly, with pristine-graphene-templated growth, the two-dimensional (2D) single-crystal MOF possesses a large lateral size of similar to 23 mu m and high aspect ratio up to, similar to 1500 and exhibits a significant electrochemical enhancement, with a charge transfer resistance of similar to 200 ohm and a 30 mA cm(-2) current density at only 0.53 V versus a reversible hydrogen electrode. The epitaxial strategy could be further applied to other 2D substrates, such as MoS2. This MOF/graphene 2D architecture sheds light on integrating insulating MOFs into electrochemical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据