4.8 Article

A Transient and Flexible Cation-π Interaction Promotes Hydrolysis of Nucleic Acids in DNA and RNA Nucleases

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 141, 期 27, 页码 10770-10776

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b03663

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) [ALTF 103-2018]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-15-CE11-0003-01]
  3. Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida et les hepatites virales (ANRS) [ECTZ18552]
  4. ITMO Cancer [18CN047-00]
  5. FRISBI [ANR-10-INSB-05-02]
  6. GRAL within the Grenoble Partnership for Structural Biology (PSB) [ANR-10-LABX-49-01]
  7. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG 18883]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-15-CE11-0003] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-dependent DNA and RNA nucleases are enzymes that cleave nucleic acids with great efficiency and precision. These enzyme-mediated hydrolytic reactions are fundamental for the replication, repair, and storage of genetic information within the cell. Here, extensive classical and quantum-based free-energy molecular simulations show that a cation-pi interaction is transiently formed in situ at the metal core of Bacteriophage-lambda Exonuclease (Exo-lambda), during catalysis. This noncovalent interaction (Lys131-Tyr154) triggers nucleophile activation for nucleotide excision. Then, our simulations also show the oscillatory dynamics and swinging of the newly formed cation-pi dyad, whose conformational change may favor proton release from the cationic Lys131 to the bulk solution, thus restoring the precatalytic protonation state in Exo-lambda. Altogether, we report on the novel mechanistic character of cation-pi interactions for catalysis. Structural and bioinformatic analyses support that flexible orientation and transient formation of mobile cation-pi interactions may represent a common catalytic strategy to promote nucleic acid hydrolysis in DNA and RNA nucleases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据