4.7 Article

Sound-aided vibration weak signal enhancement for bearing fault detection by using adaptive stochastic resonance

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
卷 449, 期 -, 页码 18-29

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.028

关键词

Bearing fault detection; Sound and vibration signal processing; Multiple sensor information fusion; Weak signal detection; Adaptive stochastic resonance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675001, 51605002, 51637001]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1608085QE110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adaptive stochastic resonance (ASR) has been proven effective in enhancing weak periodic signals that are submerged in heavy background noise. Given such benefit, ARS has also been applied in detecting bearing faults based on vibration signal analysis. However, when the vibration has an extremely low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the fault characteristic frequency may not be accurately enhanced via the traditional ASR. To address this problem, this paper designs the sound-aided vibration signal ASR (SAVASR) method, which procedures are summarized as follows. First, the bearing sound and vibration signals are demodulated. Second, the envelope vibration signal is adaptively enhanced by moving a sliding window along the time axis of the envelope sound signal. Third, the optimized fused signal is sent to the ASR system, in which the parameters are adaptively adjusted based on a synthetic evaluation index. Fourth, the bearing fault is detected from the spectrum of the optimal SAVASR output signal. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are performed to evaluate and compare the performance of SAVASR with that of ASR, where only the vibration signal is processed. Given its unique approach in detecting weak signals by fusing multiple sensor information, SAVASR shows high potential in automatically detecting bearing faults especially under low SNR conditions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据