4.6 Article

A 2.5 min cold water immersion improves prolonged intermittent sprint performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 1349-1354

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.07.002

关键词

Exercise recovery; Half-time interval; Hydrotherapy; Team-sport; Power output

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: We investigated if cold water immersion (CWI) affects exercise performance during a prolonged intermittent sprint test (1ST), designed to mimic activity patterns of team-sports. Design: Randomized-crossover design. Methods: Ten male team-sport players completed 3 IST protocols (two 40-min halves of repeated 2-min blocks consisting of a 8-s all-out sprint, 100-s active recovery and 12-s rest) on a cycle ergometer at normothermic conditions. Each half was separated by a 15 min recovery period of either: (i) passive rest, (ii) 5-min CWI at 8 degrees C (CWI-5) or (iii) 2.5-min CWI at 8 degrees C (CWI-2.5), in a random counterbalanced order. Results: Physical performance, core temperature (T-core) and heart rate were not different among conditions in the first half. In the passive rest trial, total work (TW) and peak power (PP) were lower during the second half (TW: 5.04 +/- 1.11 kJ; PP: 929 +/- 286W) than the first half (TW: 5.6611.02 kJ: PP: 1009 +/- 266 W); while TW and PP were not different between halves following CWI-5 (first half, TW: 5.34 1.02 kJ, PP: 1016 +/- 283 W; second half, TW: 5.19 +/- 1.38 kJ; PP: 996 +/- 318W) and CWI-2.5 (first half, TW: 5.47 +/- 1.19 kJ, PP: 966 +/- 261W; second half, TW: 5.25 +/- 1.17 kJ; PP: 952 +/- 231W). T-core was lower until the 20 th minute of the second half after CWI-5 and CWI-2.5 compared with passive rest. Conclusions: A post-exercise 2.5-5-min CWI attenuates the reductions in prolonged sprint performance that occur in the second half of team sports, due, at least partly, to reductions in core temperature and associated increase in heat storage. (C) 2019 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据