4.8 Article

The effect of non-uniform compression and flow-field arrangements on membrane electrode assemblies - X-ray computed tomography characterisation and effective parameter determination

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 97-110

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.018

关键词

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell; Flow-field; Compression; Effective bulk parameters; Gas diffusion layer; Contact area

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/L015277/1, EP/P009050/1, EP/M014371/1, EP/M009394/1, EP/M023508/1, EP/L015749/1, EP/N022971/1]
  2. Digital Engineering and Test Centre (APC Spoke) Virtually Connected Hybrid Vehicle (VCHV) project
  3. EPSRC [EP/M023508/1, EP/M009394/1, EP/P009050/1, EP/M014371/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of the polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell is governed by a complex interaction of the structure of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA), cell compression, and operating parameters. Adequate cell compression for improved current collection and gas sealing can structurally deform MEA with adverse consequences. Non-uniform MEA compression exerted by the flow-field design and arrangement induces heterogeneous transport properties. Hence, understanding morphological evolution and effective transport properties as an effect of MEA compression is an important factor for improving fuel cell performance and durability. In this paper, an X-ray computed tomography study of the entire MEA compression is presented, comprising of gas diffusion and microporous layers, catalyst layers, and the electrolyte membrane, subjected to non-uniform compression under two distinct flow-field arrangements. This study presents a comprehensive dataset of the heterogeneous effective properties required for robust computational modelling; including porosity, permeability, tortuosity, and diffusivity, along with the extent of blocking of the flow channel due to cell compression and effect of compression on the structural properties of the membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据