4.2 Article

Tuning the optical clarity of glass fiber-reinforced polycarbonates by reactive blending with alternatives from biorenewable isosorbide

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.29432

关键词

glass fiber-reinforced composite; High performance polymers; isosorbide; Modification; optical transparency; polycarbonates; reactive blending

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51873063]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB035505]
  3. Mitsubishi Chemicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optically transparent and mechanically strong glass fiber (GF)-reinforced polycarbonate (PC) composites were fabricated via reacting with biorenewable isosorbide (ISB) moiety. While direct copolymerization of ISB and bisphenol A (BPA) by melt transesterification with diphenyl carbonate remained difficult due to the large discrepancy of reactivity and low thermal stability of ISB, we demonstrated in this work that ISB and BPA copolycarbonates with high molecular weight, low discoloration, and excellent optical transparency can be fabricated at 250 degrees C within 2.5 min by reactive blending of commercially available ISB-based PC and BPA-PC. A systematic study of synthesis, thermal degradation, and reactive blending of ISB-containing PCs was performed to distinguish the reactivity between ISB and BPA, elucidate the effect of catalyst on chain scission, and testify the reaction mechanism of the unexpected asymmetrical inner-inner carbonate exchange. We clarified that the hydroxyl group on BPA exhibited a low reactivity and Lewis acid-catalytic transesterification played a key role in preventing from the chain scission during the asymmetrical inner-inner exchange. Another unexpected factor that effectively suppressed the further chain scission was the miscibility of the ISB-based PC with BPA-PC once each chain on average was carbonate exchanged with its counterpart to form a biblock PC. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2019

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据