4.5 Article

Structure and Physicochemical Properties of the Aβ42 Tetramer: Multiscale Molecular Dynamics Simulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 123, 期 34, 页码 7253-7269

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04208

关键词

-

资金

  1. Narodowe Centrum Nauki in Poland [2015/19/B/ST4/02721, 2017/27/N/NZ1/02871]
  2. Department of Science and Technology at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam [03/2018/HD-KHCNTT]
  3. PLGrid Infrastructure in Poland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite years of intensive research, little is known about oligomeric structures present during Alzheimer's disease (AD). Excess of amyloid beta (A beta) peptides and their aggregation are the basis of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, which attempts to explain the causes of AD. Because of the intrinsically disordered nature of A beta monomers and the high aggregation rate of oligomers, their structures are almost impossible to resolve using experimental methods. For this reason, we used a physics-based coarse-grained force field to extensively search for the conformational space of the A beta 42 tetramer, which is believed to be the smallest stable A beta oligomer and the most toxic one. The resulting structures were subsequently optimized, tested for stability, and compared with the proposed experimental fibril models, using molecular dynamics simulations in two popular all-atom force fields. Our results show that the A beta 42 tetramer can form polymorphic stable structures, which may explain different pathways of A beta aggregation. The models obtained comprise the outer and core chains and, therefore, are significantly different from the structure of mature fibrils. We found that interaction with water is the reason why the tetramer is more compact and less dry inside than fibrils. Physicochemical properties of the proposed all-atom structures are consistent with the available experimental observations and theoretical expectations. Therefore, we provide possible models for further study and design of higher order oligomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据