4.5 Article

Harnessing synthetic biology for kelp forest conservation1

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 745-751

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12888

关键词

algal; climate change; conservation; forest; genome engineering; kelp; synthetic biology

资金

  1. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Australia
  2. Australian Research Council [DP160100114, DP190100058]
  3. Bioplatforms Australia
  4. New South Wales (NSW)
  5. NSW Department of Primary Industries
  6. New South Wales (NSW) Chief Scientist and Engineer, and NSW Department of Primary Industries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental and climatic change is outpacing the ability of organisms to adapt, at an unprecedented level, resulting in range contractions and global ecosystem shifts to novel states. At the same time, scientific advances continue to accelerate, providing never-before imagined solutions to current and emerging environmental problems. Synthetic biology, the creation of novel and engineered genetic variation, is perhaps the fastest developing and transformative scientific field. Its application to solve extant and emerging environmental problems is vast, at times controversial, and technological advances have outpaced the social, ethical, and practical considerations of its use. Here, we discuss the potential direct and indirect applications of synthetic biology to kelp forest conservation. Rather than advocate or oppose its use, we identify where and when it may play a role in halting or reversing global kelp loss and discuss challenges and identify pathways of research needed to bridge the gap between technological advances and organismal biology and ecology. There is a pressing need for prompt collaboration and dialogue among synthetic biologists, ecologists, and conservationists to identify opportunities for use and ensure that extant research directions are set on trajectories to allow these currently disparate fields to converge toward practical environmental solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据