4.4 Article

Soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor, TUPS, attenuates isoproterenol/angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy through mammalian target of rapamycin-mediated autophagy inhibition

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 71, 期 8, 页码 1291-1300

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jphp.13113

关键词

autophagy; cardiac hypertrophy; mammalian target of rapamycin; soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor; TUPS

资金

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20160428180724294]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To investigate the potential role and mechanism of TUPS, a soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor, in cardiac hypertrophy. Methods Rat and H9C2 cell models of cardiac hypertrophy were induced by isoproterenol and angiotensin II, respectively, followed by TUPS treatment. The expression of hypertrophic markers, ANP and BNP, was determined by quantitative real-time PCR. The abundance of Beclin-1, LC3, p-AMPK and phosphorylated-mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) proteins was analysed by Western blot and immunohistocytology. Cell morphology and viability were evaluated by F-actin staining and MTS. H9C2 cells were transfected with GFP-LC3 to evaluate autophagy flux. Key findings TUPS significantly inhibited rat heart size, heart weight-to-body weight ratio, heart wall thickness, hypertrophic H9C2 cell swelling and viability suppression as well as the expression of ANP and BNP genes in hypertrophic models. In addition, autophagic markers Beclin-1 and LC3 were elevated in both cellular and animal models, which were suppressed by TUPS, with corresponding changes of autophagy flux. The abundance of p-AMPK was increased, while p-mTOR was decreased in hypertrophic cells, which were abolished by TUPS. Rapamycin decreased p-mTOR level, increased Beclin-1 and LC3 expression and induced cell size enlargement and cell viability inhibition in hypertrophic H9C2 cells treated with TUPS. Conclusions TUPS inhibits cardiac hypertrophy by regulating mTOR/autophagy axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据