4.5 Article

Forced Degradation of Monoclonal Antibodies After Compounding: Impact on Routine Hospital Quality Control

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 108, 期 10, 页码 3252-3261

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.06.004

关键词

monoclonal antibody; aggregation; quality control; principal component analysis; freeze-thawing stress; heating stress; mechanical stress; derivative UV spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compounded therapeutic mAbs used in a hospital require quality control (QC). In our hospital, analytical QC process intended to mAbs identification and quantification is based on flow injection analysis associated with second-derivative UV spectroscopy and matching method algorithm. We studied the influence of degraded mAbs after compounding on this validated QC. Three forced stress conditions including mechanical, thermal, and freeze-thawing stresses were studied to yield degraded mAbs from 2 model compounds, that is, bevacizumab (IgG1) and nivolumab (IgG4). Different degraded mAbs were generated and were analyzed in terms of turbidity, the percentage of aggregation, size distribution, and changes in tertiary structure. Stresses showed to be mAb-dependent in terms of aggregation. Tertiary structural changes were observed in most of the stressed samples by principal component analysis of the UV second-derivative data. The structural and physicochemical modifications conducted to mismatch depending on the nature of the stress. The mismatch ranged from 17% to 72% for the mAbs, except for freeze-thawed bevacizumab for which a perfect match (100%) was reached. The quantification with an unfulfilled relative error of the concentration (i.e., > +/- 15%) was detected only for mechanically stressed mAbs. In conclusion, the study revealed that the influence of the mAbs and the type of stress impact on the QC of compounded mAbs. (c) 2019 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据