4.6 Article

Classic Metaphyseal Lesions among Victims of Abuse

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 154-+

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.013

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To use legal statements by perpetrators to gain new insights into the causative mechanism of classic metaphyseal lesion (CML). The CML, so called corner fracture, is considered a highly specific marker for abuse in infants. However, the precise correlation between CMLs and abusive head trauma is still unknown. Study design In this retrospective observational study, we selected 67 cases with at least 1 CML from a 15-year cohort of legally prosecuted child abuse cases. Their clinical, radiologic, and forensic records were analyzed. In 27 cases, the perpetrator confessed to abusing the child and described the events. Potential associations with subdural hematoma and with confession were evaluated using 2 separate binary logistic regression models. Results All 67 infants showed other signs of abuse. Median age was 3.4 months. Over 65% had multiple CMLs. Knees and ankles were predominantly involved (64%). Only CMLs of the shoulder were significantly associated with subdural hematoma (P = .03). Different-age fractures were more common in the nonsubdural hematoma group (P = .01). In the group with confessions, perpetrators admitted inflicting violent indirect skeletal forces (torsion, traction, compression, and forced movements). The most common circumstance was diapering (44%), reported by male perpetrators only (P = .03) followed by dressing/undressing (30%). The violence was habitual in 67% of cases. Conclusions This unique forensic case series shows that CMLs are caused by violent acts inflicted most during physical care of infants. The frequency of habitual violence responsible for CMLs deserves greater attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据