4.7 Article

Solute precipitation on a screw dislocation and its effects on dislocation mobility in bcc Fe

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
卷 519, 期 -, 页码 265-273

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.007

关键词

Iron alloys; Segregation; Screw dislocation mobility; Monte Carlo

资金

  1. Euratom research and training programme [661913]
  2. National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. DOE [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  3. EPSRC [EP/P003591/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactor pressure vessel steels are well-known to harden and embrittle under neutron irradiation. The primary mechanism of radiation embrittlement for these bainitic steels is the obstruction of dislocation motion, mainly due to clusters or precipitates of solute atoms such as Cu, Ni, Mn, Si and P. Microstructural examinations reveal that these clusters or precipitates are often preferentially formed at dislocation lines, which are sometimes completely surrounded by segregated solute clusters. Evidence of this is provided in this work, too, which extends a previous one dedicated to edge dislocations, by studying the effect of this segregation around screw dislocations (Burgers vector b = 1/2 [111]) on the critical stress for dislocation motion. A Monte Carlo algorithm in a variance-constrained semi-grand canonical (VC-SGC) ensemble is applied to study the decoration of atoms around dislocations, by minimizing the free energy. Next, the critical stress for dislocation unpinning from the clusters is evaluated by standard molecular dynamics to analyze the effect of Cu, Ni, Mn, and P segregation in the Fe matrix. Consistently with expectations and in agreement with previous work, our results highlight that the required stress for triggering dislocation motion drastically increases due to the presence of segregated solutes. Our finding is that solute-decorated screw dislocations may be considered as practically immobile because of the strong segregation around them. (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据