4.4 Article

Accurate and affordable assessment of physiological and pathological tremor in rodents using the accelerometer of a smartphone

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 970-974

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00281.2019

关键词

behavior; spinal cord injury; tremor

资金

  1. Offerfonden
  2. Det Frie Forskningsrad (Denmark)
  3. Den Owensenske Fond
  4. Laege Sofus Carl Emil Friis og hustru Olga Doris Fond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tremor is a common symptom for the most prevalent neurological disorders, including essential tremor, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease. Despite the devastating effects of tremor on life quality, available treatments are few and unspecific. Because of the need for specific and costly devices, tremor is rarely quantified by laboratories studying motor control without a genuine interest in trembling. We present a simple, reliable, and affordable method aimed at monitoring tremor in rodents, with an accuracy comparable to that of expensive, commercially available equipment. We took advantage of the accelerometer integrated in modern mobile phones working with operating systems capable of running down-loaded apps. By fixing a smartphone to a cage suspended by rubber bands, we were able to detect faint vibrations of the cage. With a mouse in the cage, we showed that the acceleration signals on two horizontal axes were sufficient for the detection of physiological tremor and harmaline-induced tremor. We discuss the advantages and limitations of our method. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The majority of patients suffering from neurological disorders suffer from tremor that severely disrupts their life quality. Because of the high cost of specific scientific equipment, tremor is rarely quantified by laboratories working on motor behavior. For this reason, the potential anti-tremor effect of most compounds tested in animals remains unknown. We describe an affordable technique that will allow any laboratory to measure tremor accurately with a smartphone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据