4.6 Review

New frontiers in belowground ecology for plant protection from root-feeding insects

期刊

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 96-107

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.07.017

关键词

Ecological applications; Belowground herbivores; Rhizosphere; Root-feeding insects; Root herbivory; Soils

资金

  1. James Hutton Institute Ltd
  2. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment
  3. BBSRC [BB/K020463/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K020463/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herbivorous insect pests living in the soil represent a significant challenge to food security given their persistence, the acute damage they cause to plants and the difficulties associated with managing their populations. Ecological research effort into rhizosphere interactions has increased dramatically in the last decade and we are beginning to understand, in particular, the ecology of how plants defend themselves against soil-dwelling pests. In this review, we synthesise information about four key ecological mechanisms occurring in the rhizosphere or. surrounding soil that confer plant protection against root herbivores. We focus on root tolerance, root resistance via direct physical and chemical defences, particularly via acquisition of silicon-based plant defences, integration of plant mutualists (microbes and entomopathogenic nematodes, EPNs) and the influence of soil history and feedbacks. Their suitability as management tools, current limitations for their application, and the opportunities for development are evaluated. We identify opportunities for synergy between these aspects of rhizosphere ecology, such as mycorrhizal fungi negatively affecting pests at the root-interface but also increasing plant uptake of silicon, which is also known to reduce herbivory. Finally, we set out research priorities for developing potential novel management strategies. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据