4.6 Article

Biochar and manure effluent effects on soil biochemical properties under corn production

期刊

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 360-367

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.07.011

关键词

Biochar; Manure; Biochemical properties; Soil quality

资金

  1. Fulbright Commission
  2. ARS [911909, ARS-0429095] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biochar (BC), an aromatic carbon (C) rich compound has been used to sequester C in terrestrial ecosystems. Biochar has also been shown to improve soil fertility and crop productivity when applied to soil. Biochemical properties of soil are sensitive parameters that indicate the change in soil processes that result from soil management practices. Major knowledge gaps exist on the long term effects of biochar addition in cropped field soils. Therefore, a field experiment (3 yrs) was conducted on a Warden silt loam soil to investigate the changes in soil biochemical properties following three years of corn (Zea mays L.) production with applications of biochar (BC), fertilizer (NPK) or dairy manure (DE). The NPK or DE treatments were applied annually, while BC was applied only the first year. Organic carbon (TOC), total organic nitrogen (TON), TOC to TON ratio (CNR), soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), Metabolic quotient (MQ), potential mineralizable nitrogen (PMN), fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis activity (FDA), acid phophatase activity (ACP), alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP), beta-glucosidase activity, urease activity (URA), and soil pH were evaluated at 0-15 and 15-30 cm depths after the 3rd year of corn production. A soil quality index equation was also developed with linear scoring functions. NPK or DE with BC application increased soil pH, TOC, MBC, FDA, CN ratio, ALP and URA while decreased MQ and ACP activity. Biochar had little effect on N dynamics in the soil. Application of biochar to both NPK and DE treatments improved the soil quality index as compared to that without biochar. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据