4.4 Article

Permanent displacement models of earthquake-induced landslides considering near-fault pulse-like ground motions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 1244-1257

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-018-5067-2

关键词

Seismic slope; Permanent displacement; Pulse effect; Earthquake-induced landslides; Near-fault

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41672286, 41761144080, 41530639]
  2. Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2017JQ0042]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [KY201801005]
  4. State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining Technology [SKLGDUEK1806]
  5. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2019CX011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The permanent displacement of seismic slopes can be regarded as an effective criterion for stability estimation. This paper studied the characteristics of permanent displacements induced by velocity pulse-like ground motions and developed an empirical model to readily evaluate the stability of seismic slopes in a near-fault region. We identified 264 velocity pulse-like ground motions from the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) database using the latest improved energy-based approach. All selected ground motions were rotated to the orientation of the strongest observed pulse for considering the directivity of the pulse effect, so that the most dangerous condition for slopes was considered. The results show the velocity pulse-like ground motions have a much more significant effect on permanent displacement of slopes than non-pulse-like ground motions. A regression model based on a function of peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground acceleration (PGA) and critical acceleration (a(c)), was generated. A significant difference was found by comparing the presented model with classical models from literatures. This model can be used to evaluate the seismic slope stability considering the effects of near-fault pulse-like characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据