4.6 Article

Sensitivity of soil respiration to soil temperature decreased under deep biochar amended soils in temperate croplands

期刊

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 204-210

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.08.018

关键词

Carbon sequestration; Q(10); Soil organic carbon; Straw return; Triticum aestivum; Zea mays

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40701090, 31570439]
  2. S&T Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term effects of biochar application on soil carbon mineralization are important to evaluate the potential of biochar in carbon sequestration. Over a one-year period of time, we monitored soil respiration from a wheat-maize rotation cropping system after five years (once a year) of consecutive biochar application. In doing so four treatments with three replications each in a random design were examined: (1) a control plot without biochar and straw addition, (CT), (2) 4.5 Mg biochar ha(-1) year(-1) (B4.5), (3) 9.0 Mg biochar ha(-1) year(-1) (B9.0) and (4) straw return (SR, similar to 15 Mg wheat + maize aboveground biomass ha(-1)year(-1)). An equivalent amount of inorganic fertilizers with biochar was broadcasted on the soil surface and then plowed into similar to 16 cm soil depth prior to seeding. Both temporal dynamics and cumulative amounts of soil respiration were not significantly changed under the two biochar applications than under CT, but significantly increased under straw return than under CT and two biochar treatments. The annual respiration was 29.42, 29.96, 30.08, and 39.00 Mg CO2 ha(-1) year(-1) in CT, B4.5, B9.0 and SR treatments, respectively. Meanwhile, soil respiration positively correlated with soil temperature but negatively with soil moisture. Sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature (Q(10)) was significantly decreased due to biochar addition. These results indicated the potential of applying biochar to enhance soil carbon sequestration. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据