4.7 Article

Adjusting the morphology of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) membranes by the VIPS process for efficient oil-rich emulsion separation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 581, 期 -, 页码 178-194

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.053

关键词

P(VDF-co-HFP) membrane; Structure control; VIPS process; W/O separation; Oil-rich emulsions

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST) [MOST 106-2628-E-003-002-MY3]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR, France)
  3. MOST [MOST 106-2923-E033-001-MY4, ANR-16-CE08-0037-01]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE08-0037] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given its excellent bulk properties and highly hydrophobic nature, poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene), P(VDF-co-HFP), is a candidate material for the gravity-driven separation of water and oil from oil-rich emulsions. For this, highly porous membranes with a controlled large pore size are necessary. An ideal process to design such structures is the vapor-induced phase separation (VIPS) process but it has been underexplored using P(VDF-co-HFP). Here, we address this challenge by presenting and discussing the formulation/ process conditions that permit to obtain the desired P(VDF-co-HFP) porous bi-continuous structure by VIPS process only. Then, the membrane is fully characterized before being applied to the separation of water-in-oil emulsions, from versatile oil-rich phases, with or without the use of surfactants, in both dead-end gravity driven process and cross-flow process. In each situation, high flux and separation efficiencies were obtained, and the membrane outperformed commercial hydrophobic poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes of similar pore size/porosity in every aspect (flux, separation efficiency, mechanical sustainability). All in all, P(VDF-co-HFP) VIPS membranes appear to be ideal materials for fast and effective gravity-driven separation of oil-rich emulsions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据