4.7 Article

Ceramic nanofiltration and membrane distillation hybrid membrane processes for the purification and recycling of boric acid from simulative radioactive waste water

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 579, 期 -, 页码 294-301

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.02.044

关键词

Ceramic membrane; Nanofiltration; Membrane distillation; Boric acid

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0205700, 2017YFC0403702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91534108, 21706115, 21506093]
  3. National High Technical Research Program of China [2012AA03A606]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT13070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To reduce the emission of radioactive waste water and reuse high-value B-10-rich nuclear-grade boric acid from a nuclear power plant, a two-step membrane process was proposed based on the combination of two types of ceramic membranes. First, a ceramic nanofiltration membrane was used to purify the boric acid by removing the nuclide. Then, the purified boric acid solution was concentrated by a vacuum membrane distillation process based on a hydrophobic ceramic membrane. The operating parameters of both membrane processes were systematically discussed and optimized. In the nanofiltration process, the retention rates of Co2+ and Ag+ ions were approximately 99.2% and 75.8%, respectively, and the permeation flux was stable at approximately 178 Lm(-2) h(-1) . When a two-stage NF process was implemented, the removal of Co2+ ions was higher than 99.9%, and the removal of Ag+ ions was greater than 95%. In the membrane distillation process, the boric acid was concentrated from 1 to 107 g L-1 . Meanwhile, the permeation flux was maintained above 20 L m(-2) h(-1), and the retention rate of boric acid was maintained at a high level ( > 99.9%) throughout the entire enrichment process. The hybrid membrane processes are suitable candidates for the purification and recycling of boric acid from radioactive waste water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据