4.7 Article

An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 703-713

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.010

关键词

Material selection; Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets; MABAC method; Incomplete weight information

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71402090]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560356, 2015T80456]
  3. Program for Young of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [QD2015019]
  4. Chen Guang project - Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In engineering design, selecting the most suitable material for a particular product is a typical multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem, which generally involves several feasible alternatives and conflicting criteria. In this paper, we aim to propose a novel approach based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs) and multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) for handling material selection problems with incomplete weight information. First, individual evaluations of experts concerning each alternative are aggregated to construct the group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) decision matrix. Consider the situation where the criteria weight information is partially known, a linear programming model is established for determining the criteria weights. Then, an extended MABAC method within the IVIF environment is developed to rank and select the best material. Finally, two application examples are provided to demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed IVIF-MABAC approach. The results suggest that for the automotive instrument panel, polypropylene is the best, for the hip prosthesis, Co-Cr alloys-wrought alloy is the optimal option. Finally, based on the results, comparisons between the IVIF-MABAC and other relevant representative methods are presented. It is observed that the obtained rankings of the alternative materials are good agreement with those derived by the past researchers. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据