4.6 Article

Conversion of residue biomass into value added carbon materials: utilisation of sugarcane bagasse and ionic liquids

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 54, 期 19, 页码 12476-12487

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03800-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation-The World Academy of Science (NRF-TWAS)
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa [116610, 103979, 115465]
  3. Eskom Tertiary Education Support Programme (TESP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Presented herein is the nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes (N-MWCNTs) production from a residue, sugarcane bagasse, using 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride [C4MIM]Cl as the solvent and nitrogen source, and ferrocene as the catalyst source. N-MWCNTs were synthesised using the floating catalyst chemical vapour deposition method at 850 degrees C. The synthesised N-MWCNTs were characterised using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Raman spectroscopy. Hollow tubular structures of N-MWCNTs were observed using TEM. These observations correlated morphology from SEM which showed spaghetti-like structures, and also EDS detected the presence of nitrogen. Raman spectroscopy indicated MWCNT bands, around 1350 and 1580cm(-1) assigned to D-band and G-band due to defective and graphitic carbon vibrations, respectively. Also, XRD patterns showed typical N-MWCNT structures with a strong intensity peak at 2 theta=26.4 degrees which was indexed as the C-(002) reflection of graphite. TGA showed an N-CNTs thermogram curve, with the main decomposition temperature around 590 degrees C. The study showed that N-MWCNTs were successfully synthesised from sugarcane bagasse. The study significantly establishes a strategy for utilisation and value addition of a residue which is abundant from sugar production mills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据