4.6 Article

Modulation of biological properties by grain refinement and surface modification on titanium surfaces for implant-related infections

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 54, 期 20, 页码 13265-13282

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03811-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lloyd's Register Foundation, UK [R265000553597]
  2. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore Start-Up Grant [L0412290]
  3. Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore Strategic Academic Initiative Grant [SAI-L0494003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nanostructured titanium (Ti) obtained by the equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) has shown great promise as a biomedical implant material over the past few decades. The present work aims to investigate the effect of topographical changes caused by ECAP and piranha treatment (Tr) on the surface performance and biological properties of Ti for bone tissue engineering applications. The effects of dual treatments, i.e., ECAP and Tr, on Ti were systematically investigated by multiple characterization techniques, surface wettability, apatite-forming ability, cellular behavior, and antibacterial studies. We demonstrate that both ECAP and ECApTr samples possess desirable mechanical and physical properties and are biocompatible to cultured human fetal osteoblast (hFOB) cells. The potential of adhesion and proliferation of hFOB cells on ECAP and ECApTr samples was found to be superior to that of control unprocessed sample (annealed). Ti samples prepared by both methods showed excellent antimicrobial properties against clinical strains of the most common pathogenic bacteria causing orthopedic implant infections, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa). This study supports the established claim about mechanical properties improvement by ultrafine refinement and further enhances the antibacterial properties when chemically etched with a piranha solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据