4.7 Article

Diurnal Variation of Proton Density Fat Fraction in the Liver Using Quantitative Chemical Shift Encoded MRI

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 407-414

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26814

关键词

magnetic resonance imaging; chemical shift encoded MRI; proton density fat fraction; hepatic steatosis; diurnal variation; repeatability; reproducibility

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA009206] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [K24 DK102595, R01 DK100651, R01 DK088925, R01 DK083380] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Whole-organ, noninvasive techniques for the detection and quantification of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease features have clinical and research applications. However, the effect of time of day, hydration status, and meals are unknown factors with potential to impact bias, precision, reproducibility, and repeatability of chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) to quantify liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Purpose To assess the effect of diurnal variation on PDFF using CSE-MRI, including the effect of time of day, the effect of meals and hydration status, as well as the day to day variability. Study Type Prospective. Subjects Eleven healthy subjects and nine patients with observed hepatic steatosis. Field Strength/Sequences A commercial quantitative confounder-corrected CSE-MRI sequence (IDEAL IQ) and an MR spectroscopy (MRS) sequence (multiecho STEAM) were acquired at 1.5T. Assessment MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF estimates were compared across six visits (before and after a controlled breakfast, before and after an uncontrolled lunch, at approximately 4 pm, and then before breakfast on the following day) with three repeated measures for a total of 360 MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF measurements. Statistical Tests Linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and mixed effect models were used to determine the bias, precision, and repeatability of PDFF measurements. Results No statistically significant linear trend was observed across visits for either MRI-PDFF or MRS-PDFF (P = 0.31 and 0.37, respectively). The repeatability was measured to be 0.86% for MRI-PDFF and 1.1% for MRS-PDFF over all six visits. For MRI-PDFF, the variability between all six visits (0.94%) was only slightly higher than within each visit (0.66%), with P < 0.001. For MRS-PDFF, the variability between all six visits was 1.29%, compared with 0.87% within each visit (P < 0.001). Data Conclusion Our results may indicate that it is not necessary to control for the time of day or the fasting/fed state of the patient when measuring PDFF using CSE-MRI. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:407-414.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据