4.6 Article

Enhanced 2.75 μm emissions of Er3+ via Eu3+ deactivation in PbF2 crystal

期刊

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 164-168

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.02.032

关键词

PbF2 crystal; Deactivation; Er3+/Eu3+; 2.75 mu m emission; Energy transfer

类别

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1104500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51702124, 61735005, 11704155, 61475067]
  3. Guangdong Project of Science and Technology [2016B090917002, 2016B090926004]
  4. Guangzhou Union Project of Science and Technology [201604040006]
  5. Research project of scientific research cultivation and innovation fund of Jinan University [11617329]
  6. Guangdong Project of Featured Innovation Grants [2017KTSCX012]
  7. Guangzhou science and technology project [805182153063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of Eu3+ codoped for the enhancement of the transition of Er3+:I-4(11/2) -> I-4(13/2) similar to 2.75 mu m emissions was observed in the Er/Eu co-doped PbF2 crystal for the first time. The similar to 2.75 mu m energy transfer mechanism and fluorescence emission properties of the Eu/Er co-doped PbF2 crystal were investigated at length. The results show that the codoped of Eu3+ ion in Er/Eu:PbF2 crystal greatly enhances Er3+:2.75 mu m emission under excitation of a common 970 nm laser diode. In addition, it is found that the Eu3+ ion depopulates the lower laser level of Er3+:I-4(13/2), and has little effect on the upper laser level of Er3+:I-4(11/2) at the same time. Moreover, the energy transfer efficiency from the Er3+:I-4(13/2) level to the Eu3+:F-7(6) level is as high as 88.07%, indicating that the Eu3+ ion is an effective deactivation ion for enhancing the similar to 2.75 mu m emission in Er/Eu:PbF2 crystal. These advantageous spectroscopic characteristics suggest that the Er/Eu:PbF2 crystal may be a promising material for similar to 2.75 mu m mid-infrared lasers under the pump of a conventional 970 nm LD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据