期刊
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 9, 页码 4204-4214出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0300060519859143
关键词
Hemodialysis; sodium heparin; sodium citrate; vascular access; catheter lock solution; hemorrhage; infection
Objective Use of a catheter lock solution plays a decisive role in vascular access. The effects of different concentrations of heparin and different types of catheter lock solutions are controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of sodium citrate and sodium heparin catheter lock solutions. Methods A total of 120 patients were divided into four groups (30 patients per group) according to the use of catheter lock solution as follows: 6250 U/mL sodium heparin, 5000 U/mL sodium heparin, 2500 U/mL sodium heparin, and 4% sodium citrate. Coagulation function and the incidence of catheter occlusion, hemorrhage, and catheter-related infections were recorded. Results The different catheter lock solutions were significantly related to conduit blockage, hemorrhage, infection, and leakage levels. In the 4% sodium citrate group, the odds ratio was 0.688 for conduit blockage (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.206-2.297), 0.286 for hemorrhage (95% CI, 0.091-0.899), 0.266 for infection (95% CI, 0.073-0.964), and 0.416 for leakage (95% CI, 0.141-1.225) compared with the 6250 U/mL sodium heparin. Conclusions The solution 4% sodium citrate can effectively reduce the risk of catheter obstruction, bleeding, infection, and leakage better than sodium heparin in patients with long-term intravenous indwelling catheters.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据