4.2 Article

The butterflies of a Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone at Laguna Blanca reveal underestimation of Paraguayan butterfly diversity and need for conservation

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 707-728

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-019-00165-7

关键词

Lepidoptera; Neotropical; Community ecology; Threatened species; Southern cone; Mesophytic forest

资金

  1. Fundacion Para La Tierra

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The insect diversity of Paraguay remains poorly studied despite its position at the meeting point of some of South America's most diverse biomes and has obscured the true level of diversity and conservation value of the species present. Here, we investigate the butterfly species present across a disjunct Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone in the fragment of natural habitat at Laguna Blanca in an otherwise entirely deforested landscape, after 7 years of collection. We found 290 species (33% of species known from Paraguay), of which 47 (16%) were new records and four undescribed. They constituted a unique mix of species typical of the Atlantic forest, Cerrado, Pampas and Chaco, with 28% endemic to these regions, with half-a-dozen interior mesophytic forest specialists and even equatorial species. Diversity was higher in the forests compared to the Cerrado, contradicting trends from similar ecotones in Brazil and is likely the result of it's nutrient-poor soils, supporting lower species diversity. We estimate the actual number of species present in Paraguay to be around 1500 with around half remaining undetected. The high richness and conservation value of the species present at Rancho Laguna Blanca makes its protection critical for the persistence of these species and is especially urgent considering the imminent threats to its existence. It also indicates that other fragments of natural habitat may also still support significant levels of diversity. Their protection provides a 'silver-bullet' strategy to protect species from a variety of different biodiversity hotspots in a single area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据