4.4 Article

Comprehensive genetic analysis of 57 families with clinically suspected Cornelia de Lange syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 64, 期 10, 页码 967-978

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s10038-019-0643-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP18ek0109280, JP18dm0107090, JP18ek0109301, JP18ek0109348, JP18kk0205001]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP17H01539, JP16H05357, JP16H06254, JP17K16132, JP17K10080, JP17K15630, JP17H06994]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare
  4. Takeda Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) is a rare multisystem disorder with specific dysmorphic features. Pathogenic genetic variants encoding cohesion complex subunits and interacting proteins (e.g., NIPBL, SMC1A, SMC3, HDAC8, and RAD21) are the major causes of CdLS. However, there are many clinically diagnosed cases of CdLS without pathogenic variants in these genes. To identify further genetic causes of CdLS, we performed whole-exome sequencing in 57 CdLS families, systematically evaluating both single nucleotides variants (SNVs) and copy number variations (CNVs). We identified pathogenic genetic changes in 36 out of 57 (63.2 %) families, including 32 SNVs and four CNVs. Two known CdLS genes, NIPBL and SMC1A, were mutated in 23 and two cases, respectively. Among the remaining 32 individuals, four genes (ANKRD11, EP300, KMT2A, and SETD5) each harbored a pathogenic variant in a single individual. These variants are known to be involved in CdLS-like. Furthermore, pathogenic CNVs were detected in NIPBL, MED13L, and EHMT1, along with pathogenic SNVs in ZMYND11, MED13L, and PHIP. These three latter genes were involved in diseases other than CdLS and CdLS-like. Systematic clinical evaluation of all patients using a recently proposed clinical scoring system showed that ZMYND11, MED13L, and PHIP abnormality may cause CdLS or CdLS-like.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据