4.7 Article

Glyphosate induces benign monoclonal gammopathy and promotes multiple myeloma progression in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-019-0767-9

关键词

Glyphosate; Multiple myeloma; Vk*MYC mice; Activation-induced cytidine deaminase

资金

  1. NIH R01 grants [CA138688, CA177810]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500326]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2017A030313194]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundGlyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the USA and worldwide. There has been considerable debate about its carcinogenicity. Epidemiological studies suggest that multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have a positive and statistically significant association with glyphosate exposure. As a B cell genome mutator, activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is a key pathogenic player in both MM and B cell NHL.MethodsVk*MYC is a mouse line with sporadic MYC activation in germinal center B cells and considered as the best available MM animal model. We treated Vk*MYC mice and wild-type mice with drinking water containing 1000mg/L of glyphosate and examined animals after 72weeks.ResultsVk*MYC mice under glyphosate exposure developed progressive hematological abnormalities and plasma cell neoplasms such as splenomegaly, anemia, and high serum IgG. Moreover, glyphosate caused multiple organ dysfunction, including lytic bone lesions and renal damage in Vk*MYC mice. Glyphosate-treated wild-type mice developed benign monoclonal gammopathy with increased serum IgG, anemia, and plasma cell presence in the spleen and bone marrow. Finally, glyphosate upregulated AID in the spleen and bone marrow of both wild-type and Vk*MYC mice.ConclusionsThese data support glyphosate as an environmental risk factor for MM and potentially NHL and implicate a mechanism underlying the B cell-specificity of glyphosate-induced carcinogenesis observed epidemiologically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据