4.7 Article

Rapid adsorption and reductive degradation of Naphthol Green B from aqueous solution by Polypyrrole/Attapulgite composites supported nanoscale zero-valent iron

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 371, 期 -, 页码 8-17

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.096

关键词

Polyrrole/Attapulgite; Supported; Nanoscale zero-valent iron; Naphthol Green B; Degradation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51663014, 51503092, 51763015]
  2. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Clay Mineral Applied Research of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences [CMAR-04]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province [2017GS10857]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polypyrrole/Attapulgite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron (PPy/APT-nZVI) composites employed to extract Naphthol Green B (NGB) from aqueous solution, were successfully fabricated by chemical oxidative polymerization and liquid-phase reduction method. Comparison experiment of different materials showed that 99.59% of NGB was removed using PPy/APT-nZVI (1:0.5) after 25 min, much higher than APT, PPy, PPy/APT and nZVI. The morphology and structure of PPy/APT-nZVI (1:0.5) composites were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), which confirmed the high disperse and activity of nZVI after supported by PPy/APT. Furthermore, dynamic studies revealed that removal process was highly consistent with not only the pseudo-second-order model for adsorption but also pseudo-first-order model for degradation process, which proved the removal was controlled by chemical surface-limiting step. A possible removal mechanism, containing prompt adsorption of NGB onto the PPy/APT-nZVI (1:0.5) surface and being degraded by nZVI, was put forward. Additionally, the stability study verified the activity of nZVI can retain longer time than that of single nZVI due to such powerfully protective layers of PPy/APT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据