4.6 Article

Veteran Satisfaction with Early Experiences of Health Care Through the Veterans Choice Program: a Concurrent Mixed Methods Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 34, 期 9, 页码 1925-1933

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05116-1

关键词

patient satisfaction; Veterans; Veterans Choice Program; qualitative research

资金

  1. VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative [VCA 15-245]
  2. VA Office of Academic Affiliations Post-Doctoral Fellowship in Medical Informatics [TMI 95-660]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR002538, KL2TR002539]
  4. University of Utah

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The 2014 Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act (i.e., Choice) allows eligible Veterans to receive covered health care outside the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. The initial implementation of Choice was challenging, and use was limited in the first year. Objective To assess satisfaction with Choice, and identify reasons for satisfaction and dissatisfaction during its early implementation. Design and Participants Semi-structured telephone interviews from July to September 2015 with Choice-eligible Veterans from 25 VA facilities across the USA. Main Measures Satisfaction was assessed with 5-point Likert scales and open-ended questions. We compared ratings of satisfaction with Choice and VA health care, and identified reasons for satisfaction/dissatisfaction with Choice in a thematic analysis of open-ended qualitative data. Results Of 195 participants, 35 had not attempted to use Choice; 43 attempted but had not received Choice care (i.e., attempted only); and 117 attempted and received Choice care. Among those who attempted only, a smaller percentage were somewhat/very satisfied with Choice than with VA health care (17.9% and 71.8%, p < 0.001); among participants who received Choice, similar percentages were somewhat/very satisfied with Choice and VA health care (66.6% and 71.1%, p = 0.45). When asked what contributed to Choice ratings, participants who attempted but did not receive Choice care reported poor access (50%), scheduling problems (20%), and care coordination issues (10%); participants who received Choice care reported improved access (27%), good quality of care (19%), and good distance to Choice provider (16%). Regardless of receipt of Choice care, most participants expressed interest in using Choice in the future (70-82%). Conclusions Access and scheduling barriers contributed to dissatisfaction for Veterans unsuccessfully attempting to use Choice during its initial implementation, whereas improved access and good care contributed to satisfaction for those receiving Choice care. With Veterans' continued interest in using services outside VA facilities, subsequent policy changes should address Veterans' barriers to care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据