4.4 Article

Overall Quality and Sanitation Evaluation of Fish Stores at Local Markets in Ibague, Tolima, Colombia

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
卷 82, 期 6, 页码 1016-1021

出版社

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-209

关键词

Fishes; Food safety; Good manufacturing practices; Luminescent measurements

资金

  1. Universidad del Tolima (Colombia)
  2. SGR [830120516]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aims of this study were to verify compliance with cleaning and disinfection protocols in 16 fish stores of local markets in Ibague, Tolima, Colombia, according to current regulations by means of a checklist, and to evaluate surfaces, utensils, and water that come into direct contact with fish by luminometric tests. The presence or absence of pathogenic microorganisms in fish, e.g., Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp., was also determined using a 3M molecular detection system. Finally, the microbial loads of quality and safety indicator microorganisms (E. coli and/or coliforms, aerobic mesophilic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and Staphylococcus aureus) were evaluated with Petrifilm plates. Responses to the checklist showed weaknesses in good manufacturing practices. Luminometry results revealed that 77.2% of the surfaces, 76.9% of the utensils, and 43.7% of water samples met the established rejection limit (more than 600 relative light units). Additionally, although the absence of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. was noted, there was a high load of E. coli and/or coliforms, i.e., microorganisms that indicate that the sanitation conditions at the evaluated fish stores posed potential food safety problems. These findings necessitate corrective measures to guarantee quality of the final product. HIGHLIGHTS Results indicated ineffective cleaning and sanitation of surfaces and utensils. High incidence of coliforms indicated inadequate product handling. The low compliance with regulations was corroborated by luminometry results. Deficiencies in hygiene practices could be indicative of potential food safety problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据