4.7 Article

RUNX1 promotes tumour metastasis by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway and EMT in colorectal cancer

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1330-9

关键词

RUNX1; Colorectal cancer; KIT; Wnt/beta-catenin; EMT

类别

资金

  1. Guangdong Gastrointestinal Disease Research Center [2017B020209003]
  2. National Natural Science Funds of China [81772964]
  3. China's Postdoctoral Science Fund [2018M643129]
  4. Foundation for the President of Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University [2018C027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) plays the roles of an oncogene and an anti-oncogene in epithelial tumours, and abnormally elevated RUNX1 has been suggested to contribute to the carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the mechanism remains unclear. Methods: The expression of RUNX1 in CRC and normal tissues was detected by real-time quantitative PCR and Western blotting. The effect of RUNX1 on CRC migration and invasion was conducted by functional experiments in vitro and in vivo. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation assay verified the direct regulation of RUNX1 on the promoter of the KIT, which leads to the activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Results: RUNX1 expression is upregulated in CRC tissues. Upregulated RUNX1 promotes cell metastasis and epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of CRC both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, RUNX1 can activate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling in CRC cells by directly interacting with beta-catenin and targeting the promoter and enhancer regions of KIT to promote KIT transcription. These observations demonstrate that RUNX1 upregulation is a common event in CRC specimens and is closely correlated with cancer metastasis and that RUNX1 promotes EMT of CRC cells by activating Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Moreover, RUNX1 is regulated by Wnt/beta-catenin. Conclusion: Our findings first demonstrate that RUNX1 promotes CRC metastasis by activating the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway and EMT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据