4.7 Article

Ultrahigh-surface-area activated carbon aerogels derived from glucose for high-performance organic pollutants adsorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 546, 期 -, 页码 333-343

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.076

关键词

Activated carbon aerogels; Adsorption; Organic pollutants; p-nitrophenol

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773129, 21811530274, 91545126, 31200396]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [14JCQNJC08500]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFC0400706]
  4. 111 program, Ministry of Education, China [T2017002]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, carbon aerogels (CA) were prepared by a facile and eco-friendly approach from glucose, an abundant and inexpensive sugar molecule, and further activated by potassium hydroxide. An interconnected coral-like microstructure of carbon was built up in sol-gel process, and activation process resulted in a more efficient development of microporosity and mesoporosity. Thus, activated carbon aerogels (ACA) with specific surface area up to 2413 m(2).g(-1) were obtained. The unique morphology, ultrahigh specific surface area, and increased functional groups rendered the obtained ACA superior adsorption capacity (194.07-1030.05 mg.g(-1)) for several kinds of organic pollutants, such as phenols (phenol, p-nitrophenol and resorcinol), antibiotics (tetracycline, oxytetracycline, doxycycline and sulfamethazine), and dyes (methylene blue). Among them, the adsorption of p-nitrophenol onto ACA could reach 613.34 mg.g(-1) (293 K) and had a broad pH application range from 2 to 10 with good regeneration ability. The adsorption kinetics studies implied that intraparticle diffusion and pore diffusion were the limiting steps of the adsorption rate. Adsorption isotherms showed that the interaction between p-nitrophenol and ACA surface was monolayer adsorption. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据