4.7 Article

Characterization of lipid emulsions during in vitro digestion in the presence of three types of nanocellulose

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 545, 期 -, 页码 317-329

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.023

关键词

Cellulose nano-fibrils; TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nano-fibrils; Cellulose nanocrystals; Viscosity; Fluorescence

资金

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2016-67021-24994, 1009090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothesis: Nanocellulose (NC) has been a topic of significant interest due to its multiple applications, including that as a potential food ingredient. Due to the viscous property of NC and its potential use as emulsion stabilizers, presence of NC in food may affect properties and digestion of lipid emulsions systems. In this study, the behavior of three types of nanocellulose and its influence on lipid emulsions during digestion were investigated. Experiments: The changes in physicochemical characteristics (including particle size, microstructure, viscosity, and zeta potential) of the emulsions as well as the amount of free fatty acid released were studied and compared among the addition of different types concentrations of fiber as well as digestion phases. Findings: The colloidal stability of three types of NC differed during each digestion phase. Specifically, cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) formed hydrogel networks during the gastric phase, resulting in increased digesta viscosity. Cellulose nano-fibrils (CNF) were stable and had no morphological changes during digestion. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nano-fibrils (TEMPO-CNF) de-swelled and showed aggregation at the gastric phase. Results showed that all three types of nanocellulose at high concentrations (1% CNF, 0.25-0.36% TEMPO-CNF or 2-3% CNC) delayed initial in vitro digestion of emulsions, though the final lipolysis extent was nearly the same amongst all (47-55%). (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据