4.4 Article

Effect of CPAP Treatment of Sleep Apnea on Clinical Prognosis After Ischemic Stroke: An Observational Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 839-847

出版社

AMER ACAD SLEEP MEDICINE
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.7832

关键词

cerebrovascular recurrence; mortality; nasal continuous positive airway pressure; neurologic outcome; polysomnography

资金

  1. Vaud Pulmonary League (Ligue Pulmonaire Vaudoise)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: To evaluate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in patients with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) after an ischemic stroke. Methods: We identified patients included in the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL) who underwent polysomnography after an ischemic stroke. We compared patients without significant SDB (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] < 15 events/h: SDB-), with AHI >= 15 events/h who refused CPAP or with poor CPAP adherence (SDB+ CPAP-), and patients with SDB effectively treated by CPAP (SDB+ CPAP+). Results: We analyzed data from 101 patients (age 68.5 +/- 11.1 years, 84.1%men). In multivariate analysis the SDB+ CPAP+ group was associated with a significant reduction of stroke recurrence and mortality (odds ratio 0.13, 95%confidence interval 0.00-0.86, P = .031), whereas atrial fibrillation was independently associated with a higher risk (odds ratio 4.32, 95% confidence interval 1.51-12.33, P= .006). Event-free survival analysis (stroke recurrence and death) after 2-year follow-up showed that those in the SDB+ CPAP+ group had significantly higher cardiovascular survival, and Cox proportion hazard model identified CPAP treatment as significantly associated with survival time (P = .025). The AHI and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale subacute score were independently associated with CPAP adherence among patients with SDB. Conclusions: This observational study shows that CPAP treatment in stroke patients with moderate to severe SDB is associated with lower rates of stroke recurrence and death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据