4.6 Article

Preparation of nickel-doped nanoporous carbon microspheres from metal-organic framework as a recyclable magnetic adsorbent for phthalate esters

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1605, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460364

关键词

Ni-MOF; Magnetic Ni-C microspheres; Adsorbent; Phthalate esters

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2017204025, B2016204136, B2016204146]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31571925, 31671930]
  3. Scientific and Technological Research Foundation of the Department of Education of Hebei Province [ZD2016085]
  4. Hebei Double First Class Discipline Construction Foundation for the Discipline of Food Science and Engineering of Hebei Agricultural University [2016SPGCA18]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Agricultural University [LG201607, LG201610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, magnetic Ni doped nanoporous carbon (Ni-C) microspheres were prepared by directly calcinating Ni based metal-organic framework at 400 degrees C in nitrogen. The morphology and surface area of Ni-C microspheres were characterized by electron microscopy and N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherms. The results demonstrated that Ni nanoparticles were wrapped by the carbon matrix, resulting in the Ni-C microspheres with a strong magnetic response. The Ni-C microspheres also showed high surface area and micro/meso-porous structure, which make them efficient and recyclable magnetic adsorbent. The Ni-C microspheres were employed for magnetic solid phase extraction of phthalate esters from juice and water samples before high performance liquid chromatographic analysis. The limits of detection (S/N = 3) of the method were 0.2-0.3 ng mL(-1) for juice sample and 0.02-0.03 ng mL(-1) for water sample. The recoveries of all analytes were between 90.0%-100.6%. The Ni-C microspheres showed a great deal of potential to be an adsorbent for enrichment of other organic pollutants in different samples. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据