4.5 Article

Cucurbitacin B induces neurogenesis in PC12 cells and protects memory in APP/PS1 mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 6283-6294

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14514

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; cofilin; cucurbitacin B; glucocorticoid receptor; TrkA

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21661140001, 81273385, 21572204]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0117200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cucurbitacin B (CuB) isolated from Cucumis melo by using a PC12 cell bioassay system exhibited significant nerve growth factor (NGF)-mimic or NGF-enhancing activity in PC12 arid primary neuron cells. It was also demonstrated pro-neurogenesis effects in ICR and APP/PSI mice and improved memory deficit of APP/PSI mice. Its possible mechanism includes significant induction of the phosphorylation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR), protein kinase C (PKC), phospholipase C (PLC) and inhibition of cofilin. ChemProteoBase profiling, binding assay and cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) were used to determine the target protein. Results revealed that CuB could affect actin dynamics as an actin inhibitor but did not bind with GR. The protein level of cofilin in PC12 cells after treating 0.3 mu M and different temperatures was significantly higher than that of control group. Other neurotrophic signalling pathways, such as TrkA/TrkB, were analysed with specific inhibitors and Western blot. The inhibitors of TrkA, PLC, PKC, Ras, Raf and ERK1/2 significantly decreased the percentage of PC12 cells with neurite outgrowth and shortened the length of neurite outgrowth induced by CuB. CuB significantly induced the phosphorylation of TrkA, ERK and CREB. The phosphorylation of these proteins was obviously decreased by their specific inhibitors. These results suggest that cofilin is a candidate target protein of CuB in PC12 cells and that the GR/PLC/PKC and TrkA/Ras/Raf/ERK signalling pathways play important roles in the neuroprotective effect of CuB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据