4.8 Article

First-principles kinetic study on benzene alkylation with ethanol vs. ethylene in H-ZSM-5

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 374, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.04.021

关键词

Benzene alkylation; H-ZSM-5 zeolite; Activity and selectivity; Density functional theory; Microkinetic modeling

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0702800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673295]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kinetic insights into reaction activity and selectivity are important not only for understanding the nature of catalytic reactions but also for designing better catalysts. Here, by utilizing DFT calculations and microkinetic modeling, we systematically studied and compared the reaction mechanism (including both the stepwise and the concerted pathways) and kinetic performance of benzene ethylation by ethanol or ethylene in H-ZSM-5. We demonstrate that, under operating conditions, the activity of ethanol-involved reaction is dominantly governed by the stepwise mechanism, while that of ethylene-involved reaction is hundreds of times higher than the former and is mainly contributed from the concerted pathway. Ethylbenzene selectivity from the ethylene process is generally higher than the ethanol process, and the selectivity of both processes show positive correlations to the reaction temperature and benzene concentration. For the formation of diethylbenzene byproducts, we observed inevitable occupation of more intersection space to accommodate the extra ethyl chain but comparable barriers with ethylbenzene production, offering possibilities to further improve the selectivity by moderately tailoring zeolite pore structures. Based on the kinetic trends, we theoretically predict that the benzene-ethanol alkylation process would prefer a relatively higher operating temperature but lower pressure than the traditional ethylene process. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据