4.7 Article

Dynamic and structural insights into tick serpin from Ixodes ricinus

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
卷 38, 期 8, 页码 2296-2303

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2019.1630003

关键词

Ticks; serpins; molecular dynamics simulations; Ixodes ricinus

资金

  1. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI)
  2. Thailand Innovation 4.0 (KU-VAC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ixodid ticks have a crucial impact on people and domestic animals worldwide. These parasites also pose a serious threat to livestock. To date, vaccination of hosts against ticks is a safer, more sustainable alternative to chemical control of ticks and the disease agents they transmit. Because of their roles in tick physiology, serpins (serine protease inhibitors) from tick saliva are among the candidates for anti-tick vaccines. Inhibitory serpins employ a suicide inhibition mechanism to inhibit proteases, where the serpin reactive centre loop (RCL) is cleaved, by the targeted protease, and then inserted into the main beta-sheet of the serpin. This causes a massive conformational change called the 'stressed to relaxed' (S -> R) transition, leading to the breakdown of serpin into two regions (core domain and cleaved polypeptide). Recently, the first tick serpin crystal structure from Ixodes ricinus in R-state was reported. We thus employed molecular dynamics simulations to better understand serpin structure and dynamics in atomic detail. Overall, R-state serpin showed high rigidity, especially the core domain. The most flexible region is the terminal of the cleaved polypeptide, due to its high-water exposure, while the rest of the cleaved polypeptide is stably trapped behind the core domain. T363, D367 and N375 are found to play a vital role in protein-protein attachment. This finding can be used to explain the high stability of the R-state serpin at the atomic level and provides insight into this tick serpin which will be useful for rational anti-tick vaccine development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据