4.6 Article

Calcium impurity as a source of non-radiative recombination in (In,Ga)N layers grown by molecular beam epitaxy

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 109, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4968586

关键词

-

资金

  1. Solid State Lighting Program (SSLP)
  2. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST)
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
  4. University of California, Santa Barbara
  5. DOE Solid State Lighting Program [DE-EE0007096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ca as an unintentional impurity has been investigated in III-nitride layers grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). It is found that Ca originates from the substrate surface, even if careful cleaning and rinsing procedures are applied. The initial Ca surface coverage is similar to 10(12) cm(-2), which is consistent with previous reports on GaAs and silicon wafers. At the onset of growth, the Ca species segregates at the growth front while incorporating at low levels. The incorporation rate is strongly temperature dependent. It is about 0.03% at 820 degrees C and increases by two orders of magnitude when the temperature is reduced to 600 degrees C, which is the typical growth temperature for InGaN alloy. Consequently, [Ca] is as high as 10(18) cm(-3) in InGaN/GaN quantum well structures. Such a huge concentration might be detrimental for the efficiency of light emitting diodes (LEDs) if one considers that Ca is potentially a source of Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) defects. We thus developed a specific growth strategy to reduce [Ca] in the MBE grown LEDs, which consisted of burying Ca in a low temperature InGaN/GaN superlattice (SL) before the growth of the active region. Finally, two LED samples with and without an SL were fabricated. An increase in the output power by one order of magnitude was achieved when Ca was reduced in the LED active region, providing evidence for the role of Ca in the SRH recombination. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据