4.5 Article

Extracellular Vesicle Biomarkers Track Cognitive Changes Following Intranasal Insulin in Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 489-498

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180578

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; biomarkers; brain insulin resistance; extracellular vesicles; exosomes; intranasal insulin

资金

  1. Intramural research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Aging
  2. [P30AG049638]
  3. [RO1 AG027415]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [ZIAAG000975] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Insulin resistance is implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD), whereas intranasal insulin is an experimental treatment in clinical trials. We previously proposed insulin signaling mediators in plasma neuronal-enriched extracellular vesicles (EVs) as biomarkers of brain insulin resistance. Objective: We sought to demonstrate the capacity of neuronal-enriched EV biomarkers to demonstrate target engagement in response to intranasal insulin and their ability to track treatment-associated cognitive changes in AD. Methods: We isolated neuronal-enriched EVs from plasma samples of participants with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or probable AD involved in a 4-month duration placebo-controlled clinical trial of 20 or 40 IU intranasal insulin. We measured insulin signaling mediators as biomarkers and examined treatment-associated changes and their relationship with cognitive performance (ADAS-Cog). Results: There were no EV biomarker changes from baseline in any of the treatment groups. In participants treated with 20 IU insulin, EV biomarkers of insulin resistance (pS312-IRS-1, pY-IRS-1) showed strong positive correlations with ADAS-Cog changes, especially in ApoE e4 non-carriers. Conclusion: Neuronal EV biomarkers of insulin resistance (p5312-IRS-1, pY-IRS-1) were associated with cognitive changes in response to low dose intranasal insulin suggesting engagement of the insulin cascade in neurons of origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据