4.7 Article

Enhanced energy storage performance of (1-x)(BCT-BMT)-xBFO lead-free relaxor ferroelectric ceramics in a broad temperature range

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 789, 期 -, 页码 303-312

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.314

关键词

Energy storage; BCT-BMT; Relaxor; Aging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402196, 51602159, 11864004]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2016GXNSFCB380006, 2017GXNSFFA198015]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of Guangxi University [XTZ160530]
  4. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Nickel and Cobalt Resources Comprehensive Utilization [2019-01]
  5. Bagui Rencai & Bagui Xuezhe Funding [C31200992001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Relaxor ferroelectrics with high energy storage performances are very attractive for modern applications in electronic devices and systems. Here, it is demonstrated that large energy densities (0.52-0.58 J/cm(3)) simultaneously with high efficiencies (76%-82%) and thermal stabilities (the minimum variation of efficiency < 4% from 323 K to 423 K at x = 0.04) have been achieved in the (1-x)(BCT-BMT)-xBFO lead-free relaxor ferroelectric ceramics prepared using a conventional solid-state reaction method. Large dielectric breakdown strengths and great relaxor dispersion around the dielectric peaks are responsible for the excellent energy storage performances. The energy storage performances of as-prepared ceramics at high BFO doping amount (x = 0.06 and 0.07) were deteriorated seriously due to low dielectric breakdown strengths. However, they could be greatly improved when aged, since the operable electric field was significantly enhanced from 10 kV/cm of as-prepared samples to 100 kV/cm of aged samples due to the reduced concentration of oxygen vacancies during the aging process. The excellent energy storage performances may make them attractive materials for applications in modern energy storage systems in a broad temperature range. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据