4.7 Article

Enhanced visible emission in Eu3+ doped glass containing Ag-clusters, Ag nanoparticles, and ZnO nanocrystals

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 793, 期 -, 页码 410-417

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.122

关键词

Europium ion; ZnO nanocrystals; Ag nanoparticles; Ag clusters; CO2 laser; Energy transfer

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2016R1D1A3B03936239]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1D1A3B03936239] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the formation of ZnO nanocrystals, Ag-clusters, and Ag nanoparticles in Eu-doped borate glasses by furnace annealing and CO2 laser annealing. The XRD and optical properties of the samples obtained with two techniques were analyzed and compared to each other. The absorption spectra of the samples presented surface plasmon bands centered at 430 nm associated with nanoparticles. The EDS image revealed the incorporation of rare-earth ions into ZnO nanocrystal. The overall down-conversion blue-green emission intensity obtained with 365 nm excitation was enhanced by 70 times in the glass treated by the CO2 laser, mainly due to the Ag-cluster formation. These results indicate the possibility of the development of a more efficient and spatially selective display in the glass host. The yellow-red emission enhancement of Eu3+ ions was explained by energy transfer from the Ag-nanoclusters to Eu3+ ions, as well as the crystalline environment due to ZnO nanocrystal formation. Up-conversion emissions of the Eu3+ ions under 980 nm excitation were enhanced with thermal treatments due to the incorporation of Eu3+ ions in ZnO nanocrystals. Energy transfer between the Ag species and Eu3+ ions is discussed so as to explain the emission properties. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据