4.4 Article

Keeping reptiles as pets in Brazil: Ethnozoological and conservation aspects

期刊

JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 9-21

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2019.02.002

关键词

Wildlife trade; Ethnozoology; Ethnoherpetology; Invasive species; Exotic species

资金

  1. CNPq/Edital Universal program [422041/2018-1]
  2. UEPB/PROPESQ
  3. CNPq
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regardless of many legal restrictions, the keeping of and trade in reptiles as pets has been increasing in Brazil over the last few years. We present an analysis of the trade and use of reptiles as pets in Brazil and discuss the implications. Data were obtained through semi-structured questionnaires given to 719 owners, who were contacted through reptile-owner groups on the social network Facebook. A total of 69 reptile species were reported as pets in Brazil, of which there were 39 snakes, 17 lizards, 12 chelonians and 1 species of crocodilian. Of the reported species, 46 are native to Brazil and 23 are exotic, including threatened species. Owners were distributed in at least 24 states, with a higher concentration in Southeast Brazil and the Federal District. Owners usually acquire animals through purchase, although prices vary and are high for some species, making reptile ownership more common among high-income individuals. Prices were affected by factors such as beauty, colour pattern, size, sex and even rarity. The keeping of reptiles as pets raises conservation concerns, as the practice directly impacts exploited populations and is a potential introduction pathway for invasive species, including exotic species that have already been recorded in natural habitats in Brazil. A thorough discussion, encompassing various stakeholders - namely, owners, traders and environmental authorities - is much needed, to address management strategies, and propose feasible solutions. Conservation and animal welfare NGOs should also be involved in this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据