4.1 Article

Mode of action and anti-Candida activity of Artemisia annua mediated-synthesized silver nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL DE MYCOLOGIE MEDICALE
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 201-209

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2019.07.005

关键词

Proteinases; Phospholipases; Morphological transition; Ergosterol synthesis

类别

资金

  1. University Grant Commission (UGC)
  2. Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candida albicans is a polymorphic opportunistic commensal that causes both superficial and systemic fungal infections especially in immunocompromised patients. Biologically synthesized silver nano-particles (AgNPs) have emerged as potential antifungal agents. The present work evaluates the antifungal activity of Artemisia annua synthesized AgNPs against three Candida species (C albicans ATCC 90028, C tropicalis ATCC 750 and C glabrata ATCC 90030). The in vitro effect of AgNPs was investigated for fungal growth, sterol content, secretion of hydrolytic enzymes and yeast-to-hyphal transition. The green synthesized AgNPs were effective against all the three species with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in the range 80-120 mu gml(-1). Candida glabrata showed greater sensitivity for AgNPs followed by Candida tropicalis and C. albicans. AgNPs at 4MIC were as effective as fluconazole (FLC) and caused only 5% haemolysis while FLC caused 50% haemolysis at the same concentration. The secretion of hydrolytic enzymes was the lowest in case of AgNP exposed C. glabrata. Yeast-to-hyphal transition was significantly reduced in treated C. albicans cells and showed disfigured morphology in SEM images. The decrease in ergosterol content was slightly higher (94%) in both C. glabrata and C. tropicalis in comparison to C. albicans (69%). Green synthesized AgNPs thus have immense potential as an antifungal and can play a crucial role in the management of Candida infections especially those caused by C. glabrata. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据