4.6 Article

Integrated Simulation Framework for Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: Melt Pool Dynamics, Microstructure, Solid-State Phase Transformation, and Microelastic Response

期刊

JOM
卷 71, 期 10, 页码 3640-3655

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-019-03618-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. Office of Laboratory Directed Research and Development [18-SI-003]
  3. US Department of Energy Office of Science [17-SC-20-SC]
  4. National Nuclear Security Administration [17-SC-20-SC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To accelerate the establishment of fundamental understanding of the additive manufacturing (AM) process and its influence on microstructural evolution and related properties, we develop a multiphysics and multiscale modeling framework that integrates: (1) a high-fidelity powder-scale three-dimensional simulation of transient heat transfer and melt flow dynamics, (2) cellular automaton simulation of solidification grain structure and texture, (3) phase-field modeling of precipitation and dissolution of second-phase precipitate during repeated thermal cycles, and (4) microstructure-based micro- and mesoscopic elastic response calculation. Using Ti-6Al-4V as a model system, we demonstrate the application of the integrated framework to simulate complex microstructure evolution during a single-track laser powder bed fusion process and the associated mechanical response. Our modeling framework successfully captures the solidification beta grain structure as a function of laser power and scanning speed, alpha precipitation upon subsequent cooling with different rates, and elastic response of the resulting (alpha + beta) two-phase microstructure. The key features of solidification and second-phase precipitate microstructures, and their dependence on processing parameters, agree well with existing experimental observations. The established modeling framework is generally applicable to other metallic materials fabricated by AM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据