4.2 Article

Factors related to perioperative nurses' job satisfaction and intention to leave

期刊

JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12263

关键词

burnout; turnover; work environment; work satisfaction; workload

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim This study investigated factors associated with perioperative nurses' job satisfaction and their intention to leave. Recruitment and retention of nurses are particularly important in a specialist environment such as the perioperative setting where it is especially difficult to attract and retain nurses due to its unique environment. Methods Cross-sectional data were drawn from a larger study on nurses' work environments, conducted in one province of Canada. An e-survey tool, consisting of validated scales, was administered by the provincial nurses' union to a stratified random sample of registered nurses. The study sample consisted of 113 perioperative nurses working in acute-care hospitals. This study included two outcome variables (job satisfaction and intention to leave) and five predictor variables (three aspects of work environment, workload, and emotional exhaustion). Data were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regressions. Results A multivariate linear regression model explained 49% (adjusted R-2) of variance in nurses' job satisfaction, and a multivariate logistic regression explained 19% (McFadden's R-2) of the variance in their intent to leave. After controlling for work status and other predictors, nurse-physician relationship was significantly related to nurses' job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion was the key predictor for both outcome variables. Conclusions This study demonstrated that higher emotional exhaustion is associated with decreased job satisfaction and increased intention to leave among perioperative nurses. The findings suggest that nurse managers should create an empowering and open work environment that fosters perioperative nurses' job satisfaction and reduces their intention to leave.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据