4.7 Article

Discriminative Accuracy of FEV1: FVC Thresholds for COPD-Related Hospitalization and Mortality

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 321, 期 24, 页码 2438-2447

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.7233

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [K23 HL133438, R21 HL129924, K23 HL130627]
  2. NHLBI
  3. Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN268201700001I, HHSN268201700002I, HHSN268201700003I, HHSN268201700005I, HHSN268201700004I]
  4. NHLBI [HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C, HHSN268201800001C, N01HC55222, N01HC85079, N01HC85080, N01HC85081, N01HC85082, N01HC85083, N01HC85086, U01HL080295, U01HL130114]
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  6. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [R01AG023629]
  7. NIA [N01-AG-6-2101, N01-AG-6-2103, N01-AG-6-2106, R01-AG028050]
  8. National Institute of Nursing Research [R01-NR012459]
  9. intramural research program at NIA
  10. NIH/NHLBI [R01-HL-077612, R01-HL-093081, RC1-HL-100543, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, N01-HC-95169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE According to numerous current guidelines, the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires a ratio of the forced expiratory volume in the first second to the forced vital capacity (FEV1: FVC) of less than 0.70, yet this fixed threshold is based on expert opinion and remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To determine the discriminative accuracy of various FEV1: FVC fixed thresholds for predicting COPD-related hospitalization and mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Pooled Cohorts Study harmonized and pooled data from 4 US general population-based cohorts (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study; Cardiovascular Health Study; Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study; and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). Participants aged 45 to 102 years were enrolled from 1987 to 2000 and received follow-up longitudinally through 2016. EXPOSURES Presence of airflow obstruction, which was defined by a baseline FEV1: FVC less than a range of fixed thresholds (0.75 to 0.65) or less than the lower limit of normal as defined by Global Lung Initiative reference equations (LLN). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was a composite of COPD hospitalization and COPD-related mortality, defined by adjudication or administrative criteria. The optimal fixed FEV1: FVC threshold was defined by the best discrimination for these COPD-related events as indexed using the Harrell C statistic from unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Differences in C statistics were compared with respect to less than 0.70 and less than LLN thresholds using a nonparametric approach. RESULTS Among 24 207 adults in the pooled cohort (mean [SD] age at enrollment, 63 [10.5] years; 12 990 [54%] women; 16 794 [69%] non-Hispanic white; 15 181 [63%] ever smokers), complete follow-up was available for 11 077 (77%) at 15 years. During a median follow-up of 15 years, 3925 participants experienced COPD-related events over 340 757 person-years of follow-up (incidence density rate, 11.5 per 1000 person-years), including 3563 COPD-related hospitalizations and 447 COPD-related deaths. With respect to discrimination of COPD-related events, the optimal fixed threshold (0.71; C statistic for optimal fixed threshold, 0.696) was not significantly different from the 0.70 threshold (difference, 0.001 [95% CI, -0.002 to 0.004]) but was more accurate than the LLN threshold (difference, 0.034 [95% CI, 0.028 to 0.041]). The 0.70 threshold provided optimal discrimination in the subgroup analysis of ever smokers and in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Defining airflow obstruction as FEV1: FVC less than 0.70 provided discrimination of COPD-related hospitalization and mortality that was not significantly different or was more accurate than other fixed thresholds and the LLN. These results support the use of FEV1: FVC less than 0.70 to identify individuals at risk of clinically significant COPD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据